Need for a new US foreign policy

US foreign policy is based on an inherent contradiction and fatal flaw.

The aim of US foreign policy is a US-dominated world, in which the US writes the global trade and financial rules, controls advanced technologies, maintains military supremacy and dominates all potential competitors.

And unless the US foreign policy is changed to recognise the need for a multipolar world, it will lead to more wars and possibly World War III.

The inherent contradiction in US foreign policy is that it conflicts with the UN Charter, which commits the US (and all other UN member states) to a global system based on UN institutions, in which no country dominates.

The fatal flaw is that the US has just four per cent of the world population and lacks the economic, financial, military and technological capacities, much less the ethical and legal claims, to dominate the rest.

At the end of World War II, the US was far ahead of the rest of the world in economic, technological and military power. Not anymore; many other countries have built their economies and technological capacities.

French President Emmanuel Macron recently spoke the truth when he said the European Union does not want to be a vassal of the US, though it’s its ally.

He was widely attacked in the US and Europe for that because many mediocre politicians in Europe depend on US political support to stay in power.

In 2015, US Ambassador Robert Blackwill, an important US foreign policy strategist, described US grand strategy with exceptional clarity.

He wrote: “Since its founding, the United States has consistently pursued a grand strategy focused on acquiring and maintaining pre-eminent power over various rivals, first on the North American continent, then in the Western hemisphere, and finally globally.” He argued that “preserving US primacy in the global system ought to remain the central objective of US grand strategy in the twenty-first century”.

Sustain US primacy

To sustain US primacy vis-à-vis China, Blackwill laid out a game plan that President Joe Biden is following. Among other measures, he called on the US to create “new preferential trading arrangements among US friends and allies to increase their mutual gains through instruments that consciously exclude China”; a “technology-control regime” to block China’s strategic capabilities; a build-up of “power-political capacities of US friends and allies on China’s periphery”; and strengthened US military forces along the Asian rimlands despite Chinese opposition.

Most US politicians and many in Britain, the EU, Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand support the US’s aggressive approach. I do not. I view the US approach to China as contrary to the UN Charter and peace.

China has the right to prosperity and national security, free from US provocations around its borders. China’s remarkable economic accomplishments since the late 1970s are wonderful for both China and the world.

During the long century from 1839 to 1949, China was driven into extreme poverty in a period marked by European and Japanese invasions of China, as well as Chinese civil wars.

Britain invaded in 1839 to force China to buy Britain’s addictive opium. Other powers piled on during the following century. China has finally recovered from that disastrous period and, in the process, ended the poverty of around a billion people!

China’s new prosperity can be both peaceful and productive for the world. China’s successful technologies—ranging from vital cures for malaria to low-cost solar power and efficient 5G networks—can be a boon for the world.

China will only be a threat to the extent that the US makes China an enemy. US hostility to China, which mixes the arrogant US aim of dominance with long-standing anti-Chinese racism dating back to the 19th Century, is creating that enemy.

The dangers of US foreign policy extend beyond China. The US goal to expand Nato to Ukraine and Georgia, thereby surrounding Russia in the Black Sea, helped to stoke the war in Ukraine.

Countless nations see the danger of this approach. Major nations, from Brazil to India and beyond, aim for a multipolar world. All UN member states should recommit to the UN Charter and oppose claims of dominance by any nation.

Prof Sachs is professor and director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and president of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. www.jeffsachs.org.