Jilted lover to serve 30 years in jail for splashing acid in woman’s eyes
Mohammed Mwarandu Kombe when he appeared before a Mombasa Court on May 8, 2024. Kombe has been jailed for 30 years for splashing acid on his girlfriend for rejecting him.
What you need to know:
- “It is quite unfortunate that Ms Kaingu will never enjoy the sense of vision which is one of the most important senses. For the rest of her life, she will not enjoy everyday activities like hobbies. She shall no longer see the beauty of the world,” said the magistrate.
- In her ruling, the magistrate noted that it was regrettable that Kombe’s cruelty and inhumane act completely altered the woman’s life.
A 30-year-old man, who splashed acid on his girlfriend's face after she rejected him following a short courtship, has been sentenced to 30 years in prison.
Mohamed Mwarandu Kombe will now serve three decades behind bars for his inability to cope with the fact that Ms Fatuma Kaingu no longer wanted to be with him.
Mombasa Senior Resident Magistrate, Gladys Olimo, sentenced the spurned lover, noting that his actions had permanently deprived Ms Kaingu, 23, of her eyesight.
“It is quite unfortunate that Ms Kaingu will never enjoy the sense of vision which is one of the most important senses. For the rest of her life, she will not enjoy everyday activities like hobbies. She shall no longer see the beauty of the world,” said the magistrate.
In her ruling, the magistrate noted that it was regrettable that Kombe’s cruelty and inhumane act completely altered the woman’s life.
“It is against this backdrop that this court is in agreement with the state that a deterrent sentence is necessary in the circumstance of this case. Consequently, Kombe is sentenced to serve 30 years imprisonment. Right of appeal is 14 days,” said Ms Olimo.
While jailing the man, the magistrate noted that she had considered the prosecution’s submission and the accused mitigation that he was a family man and first offender, with no previous criminal record.
“I know Kombe has a young family. However, it is of interest to know the aggravating circumstances obtained in this case. The complainant completely lost her eyesight as a result of the accused actions,” said the magistrate.
The court also observed that the complainant's testimony was adequately supported by medical evidence indicating that her conjunctiva was infected, red, swollen, and with a laceration on the upper lid.
These injuries were classified as grievous bodily harm.
“Given that the conjunctiva was infected, red, and swollen, and the complainant's testimony that she has completely lost her eyesight and the medical evidence, it is sufficient proof that the injuries sustained endangered her life and extended to permanent disfigurement,” said the magistrate.
Kombe was charged with two offences of grievous harm and malicious property damage.
The court heard that Kombe sprinkled acid on the victim’s face causing her permanent blindness.
He also damaged her mobile phone valued at Sh6,000. These offences were committed on November 15, 2021, in Tudor, Mombasa.
Ms Kaingu was at the time working as a house help in the neighbourhood.
The court heard that on the material day, Kombe followed her to the house and sprinkled the acid on her face.
“Before the incident, the two were in a relationship, but Maingu had communicated to the accused person that she was not interested in the relationship anymore,” said the officer, while being cross-examined by state counsel Hillary Isiaho.
Kombe then became upset with the complainant’s move and decided to harm her as a way of revenge.
“He splashed a chemical onto the victim’s face at night after he met her,” she told the court.
However, Kombe denied the offenses, claiming he did not harm the victim.
He explained that he had purchased liquid soap, which he used to defend himself by splashing it on the victim's face.
"It was not acid, but liquid soap. The victim had attacked me with a stone, and I splashed the water on her in self-defence," he stated.
Kombe mentioned that the victim did not suffer any injuries when he left her because he had also used non-harmful liquid soap.
He acknowledged being with the victim on the day in question and trying to calm her down after their disagreement.
"The victim was unharmed when I departed. We had a dispute, but I did not harm her," he clarified.
Nevertheless, the court rejected his defense, citing numerous contradictions.
“Kombe’s defense consists of half-truths and twisted facts and mere afterthoughts. I find the offense of grievous harm has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. I do find him guilty as charged and accordingly convict him,” said the magistrate.
Mr Isiaho requested the court to impose a strict sentence that would serve as a deterrent, considering that the accused's actions deprived the victim of her bodily autonomy and light.
“We urge that the accused receive a prison term that reflects the seriousness of the offense he has committed and the lasting impact it has had on the victim,” stated the prosecutor.
On the other hand, Kombe appealed for leniency, expressing concern for his young family that required his care.
“I got married just last year, I have a young family with a child. I implore the court to show me mercy,” he pleaded.
Despite Kombe's plea for mercy and leniency, the court disregarded it, emphasizing that he must face a custodial sentence for the consequences of his actions.
