Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Martha Koome
Caption for the landscape image:

Chief Justice Martha Koome’s security detail withdrawn, Judiciary Police Unit trimmed

Scroll down to read the article

Chief Justice Martha Koome.

Photo credit: Dennis Onsongo | Nation Media Group

The Interior ministry has withdrawn Chief Justice Martha Koome’s security detail and cut down the number of officers in the Judiciary Police Unit, triggering tension between the two State institutions.

Justice Koome on Thursday wrote a protest letter to Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen and Inspector-General of Police Douglas Kanja, in which she stated that the move translates to Executive interference with the Judiciary contrary to the Constitution’s demands for independence of both arms of government.

In the letter, Judge Koome has urged Mr Murkomen and Mr Kanja to restore her security detail, made up of police officers, unconditionally, and to strengthen the capacity of the Judiciary Police Unit.

“The withdrawal of this security detail is an egregious affront to the principle of separation of powers. Such an action not only weakens trust in public institutions but also sets a perilous precedent, suggesting that key constitutional offices can be undermined through external pressure or retaliation,” CJ Koome said in the letter.

“By exposing the office (of the CJ) to vulnerabilities through withdrawal of security, the ability of the Judiciary to perform its constitutional mandate is gravely compromised.”

This is the second time in four months that the Judiciary is protesting withdrawal of the security detail of a senior judge.

High Court Judge Lawrence Mugambi’s bodyguards were disarmed and withdrawn in September, setting off a row between the two arms of government. Coincidentally, both withdrawals came on the eve of expected appearance in court of top police officers to respond to charges of abduction and disappearance of Kenyans.

'Recalled for courses'

On the Judiciary Police Unit, CJ Koome held that reduction of officers has exposed court users to danger.

The National Police Service, in a statement Thursday evening, said the Judicial Police Unit officers have been recalled to attend promotional courses. 

“In the meantime, they have been replaced by other officers  for the period they will be on training. The National Police Service reiterates its commitment to multi-agency collaboration and cooperation within the criminal justice system of Kenya,” said Police Spokesperson, Dr Resila Onyango.

CS Murkomen had not responded to our requests for comment by the time of going to press.

The Judiciary Police Unit was formed in 2021, and is under the National Police Service.

In June, 2024 the chief justice and Law Society of Kenya called for deployment of more officers to the Judiciary Police Unit following the murder of Principal Magistrate Monica Kivuti during an active court session at the Makadara Law Courts.

Ms Kivuti was shot dead by a senior police officer, Londiani police chief Samson Kipruto.

Officers from the Judiciary Police Unit, who were present shot the officer commanding station, dead as he fired at them.

The LSK called for an autonomous Judiciary Police Unit with presence in all court stations across the country.

In her letter to Mr Murkomen and Mr Kanja, CJ Koome says that the unit needed more officers to enhance security in Judiciary spaces.

“This (withdrawal of Judiciary Police Unit officers) not only exacerbates existing vulnerabilities but also jeopardizes the security of judicial personnel and spaces across the country, thereby undermining the entire justice system’s operational efficacy,” she said.

“Additionally, the capacity of the Judiciary Police Unit must be strengthened, not diminished, to address the pressing need for enhanced judicial security in a rapidly evolving environment and against the precedent of open attack of judges and judicial officers in open court,” CJ Koome added.