Bid to recover Miwani sugar land suffers major set-back
Plans by the government to recover hundreds of acres of land formerly owned by Miwani Sugar Company have been dealt a blow after a judge ruled that there was no proof of fraud when the land was auctioned 13 years ago.
Plans by the government to recover hundreds of acres of land formerly owned by Miwani Sugar Company have been dealt a blow after a judge ruled that there was no proof of fraud when the land was auctioned 13 years ago.
Justice Anthony Ombwayo equally dealt a blow to Kisumu county government, which sought to acquire part of the land for special economic zones.
The judge said other than the allegation that some of the directors of the company, which was placed under receivership, there was no specific evidence of any role of fraud played by the purchaser of the property Crossley Holdings Ltd. “I have gone through all the decisions of the court on this point. Since I have already found that fraud or misrepresentation has not been proved, the title of the petition is protected by Section 26 (1)(a) and (b) of the Land Registration Act,” the judge said while upholding the title acquired by Crossley Holdings Ltd.
Crossley Holdings purchased the expansive land (9,000 acres) in December 2007 for Sh752 million through a public auction.
The land was initially owned by Miwani Sugar Mills Limited, a private limited company and whose assets and liabilities were purportedly taken over in 1989 by Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Ltd (in receivership).
In July 10 last year, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Authority placed an ad in the local dailies titled, International Expression of Interest (IEOI) for leasing and operating each of the five (5) state-owned sugar factories in Kenya.
Receivership
In the IEOI, the ministry listed Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Ltd (in receivership) as one of the purportedly State-owned sugar factories offered, and sought bids to redevelop the factories into large sugar complexes and also manage them for a leasehold period of 25 years.
Crossley challenged the move saying the decision was illegal because the land was privately owned.
The court ruled that the previous owner of the land was Miwani Sugar Mills Limited, which was a private entity.
The judge said there was no document produced to show that the property was ever owned by a State department or organ and an entry showing registration of certificate of incorporation, did not amount to transfer to the Miwani Sugar (in receivership).
He said the State did not comply with the law and specifically the External Loans and Credits Act in its deals with Miwani Sugar Mills Limited and Miwani Sugar Company Limited hence the agreements with those entities are illegal null and void.
