Let President reject narcotics bill

Parliament

Parliament in session.

Photo credit: File |  Nation Media Group

What you need to know:

  • One of the failures of the proposed law is that it does not make adequate provisions to address the public health needs of persons with problematic drug use.
  • The Bill also fails to make adequate and intentional provisions to tackle the public concern over unnecessary incarceration of petty offenders.

The Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) (Amendment) Bill 2020 was passed by the National Assembly during a session of the Committee of the Whole House on May 19, 2021 and is now awaiting President Uhuru Kenyatta's assent to become law.

But there are arguable and compelling reasons as to why His Excellency the President, in his wisdom and concern for the welfare of all Kenyans - including those burdened by drug addiction and their families - should not append his signature to the Bill but have it returned to the House for further deliberation, input and consensus.

The Bill, as it is, is a product of a process that excluded robust public participation as required by the Constitution and deliberately ignored concrete evidence presented to the drafters that, among other things, it unnecessarily creates insurmountable hurdles in regard to access to healthcare for low cadre users hopelessly hooked to drugs.

This despite international best practices and trends now unreservedly recommending that such individuals be considered candidates for public health interventions.

Instead, the legislation adopts a punitive approach that hinges on the minimum mandatory sentences which law enforcement agencies, as we know them, will only be too happy to latch on to target low level offenders found with negligible amounts while turning a blind eye to the shenanigans of the real traffickers.

This was done despite spirited efforts by the Civil Society Organisations, drug addiction experts, legal minds and policy makers to sensitize legislators on the economic and social benefits of public health approaches for users.

Substance use problems

One of the failures of the proposed law is that it does not make adequate provisions to address the public health needs of persons with problematic drug use contrary to Article 43 of the Constitution. This negates the whole objective of reforming these individuals, leading to a relapse or even adverse impact on their health. Simply put, these individuals require treatment, not incarceration.

The Bill also fails to make adequate and intentional provisions to tackle the public concern over unnecessary incarceration of petty offenders, mostly individuals arrested with small quantities of drugs for personal use.

As we are all aware, this arbitrary arrest and incarceration is one of the causes of overcrowding in prisons with individuals who would otherwise be productive members of the community confined to congested prisons yet all it would take to make them better citizens is a readily available reform programme.

Although the changes propose a lower prison sentence for users, the increase in the minimum fine payable will guarantee mass imprisonment for the culprits, mostly economically overburdened women and youth. 

We wish to draw our President's attention to the fact that the State has already implemented several interventions regarding treatment and reintegration of persons living with drug use disorders. These processes have been ongoing for many years, and include, inter alia, the Methadone Programme currently operational in a number of counties and establishment of guidance, counselling and rehabilitation centres in the devolved units.

The proposals that we have made shall have minimal fiscal implications for implementation as the public health component will simply be integrated in the criminal justice system as an alternative to incarceration. 

It is an established best practice globally that persons with substance use problems be diverted from the criminal justice system and directed to public health interventions, which are readily available under the highly influential Ministry of Health. This is what the globally-acclaimed Harm Reduction Programme, of which Kenya is a beneficiary, is all about.

The cost of keeping small-time users in prison wastes limited resources that can be used to improve already strained health services including treatment and rehabilitation.

War against drug abuse

We cannot fail to commend the drafters for some changes in the Bill which now rightly recognize treatment in addition to voluntary rehabilitation for people in possession of small quantities of drugs for personal use. However, the inclusion of these aspects as additions rather than alternatives to punishment is counterproductive to public health efforts. 

Kenya’s classification as a middle income economy could soon negatively impact access to funding for local Harm Reduction Programmes which are heavily funded by international development partners. Having a sound legislative backing will, therefore, catalyze greater commitment by the Government of Kenya by establishing the most effective framework to sustain and expand comprehensive and coordinated Harm Reduction resources and services in the country. 

It is our considered view that the war against drugs and drug abuse can only be won through a decisive action that recognises the handling of persons living with drug use disorders from a human rights and public health perspective, while taking a tougher stand on traffickers.

His Excellency the President should therefore return the Bill to the House and direct the drafters to undertake proper, rigorous public participation which includes consultations with public health experts and affected communities for an informed perspective of what works in effectively addressing the issue of problematic drug use.

Similarly, the authors should re-draft the sub-section on treatment and rehabilitation of persons arrested for possession of small quantities for personal use to avail effective alternative options and not additional punishment.

Overly punitive measures meant to fulfil objectives relating to drug control have and will continue to affect the poorest and most marginalised Kenyans - particularly women and the youth - should we fail to take advantage of this window of opportunity to ground the envisaged new law on evidence and the realities of our time.

Ms Apondi is a policy consultant at VOCAL-KENYA. berniceapondi@gmailcom

Kenendy Chesoli's column will resume after a fortnight